<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A and the enhancement under Section 36(1)(iii). However, the issue under Section 56(2)(viib) was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation based on substantiated fair market value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A and the enhancement under Section 36(1)(iii). However, the issue under Section 56(2)(viib) was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation based on substantiated fair market value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>