<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 93 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395718</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge against disqualification as a director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The court directed the petitioner to make a representation before the Registrar of Companies, Guwahati, regarding the retention of Director Identification Number and Digital Signature Certificate and removal from the list of disqualified directors. The Registrar was instructed to provide a reasoned decision within 15 days. Failure to comply within 7 days would lead to withdrawal of interim relief, allowing the Registrar to take necessary action. The writ petition was disposed accordingly, emphasizing due process and the opportunity for the petitioner to present his case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 05:29:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 93 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395718</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge against disqualification as a director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The court directed the petitioner to make a representation before the Registrar of Companies, Guwahati, regarding the retention of Director Identification Number and Digital Signature Certificate and removal from the list of disqualified directors. The Registrar was instructed to provide a reasoned decision within 15 days. Failure to comply within 7 days would lead to withdrawal of interim relief, allowing the Registrar to take necessary action. The writ petition was disposed accordingly, emphasizing due process and the opportunity for the petitioner to present his case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>