https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395715 The amendment substituting the words "under this Act" in Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not cure the constitutional defect identified in Nikesh Tarachand Shah, because the twin bail conditions continued to operate in the same restrictive manner and were not revived by the substitution. The later decision in P. Chidambaram was treated as fact-specific and not determinative of the constitutional issue. On the facts, the allegations and surrounding circumstances were sufficient to justify anticipatory bail, and the petitioner was held entitled to that relief. en-us Thu, 28 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2020 05:29:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395715 The amendment substituting the words "under this Act" in Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not cure the constitutional defect identified in Nikesh Tarachand Shah, because the twin bail conditions continued to operate in the same restrictive manner and were not revived by the substitution. The later decision in P. Chidambaram was treated as fact-specific and not determinative of the constitutional issue. On the facts, the allegations and surrounding circumstances were sufficient to justify anticipatory bail, and the petitioner was held entitled to that relief. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 28 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395715