<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1816 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288391</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petitions as they were deemed not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, citing the availability of an appellate remedy under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court did not delve into the merits of the cases, leading to the closure of the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1816 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288391</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petitions as they were deemed not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, citing the availability of an appellate remedy under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court did not delve into the merits of the cases, leading to the closure of the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>