<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1357 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288389</link>
    <description>An anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC sought interim protection pending further consideration. The Court issued notice, granted the State time to file a status report, and required the petitioner to join the investigation whenever called and to furnish contact details to facilitate investigation. On that basis, the petitioner was protected from coercive action till the next date of hearing, and interim protection was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1357 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288389</link>
      <description>An anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC sought interim protection pending further consideration. The Court issued notice, granted the State time to file a status report, and required the petitioner to join the investigation whenever called and to furnish contact details to facilitate investigation. On that basis, the petitioner was protected from coercive action till the next date of hearing, and interim protection was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>