<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 564 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288379</link>
    <description>Excise duty refunds require strict compliance with the conditions and prescribed procedure of the relevant exemption notification. Refund claims must also satisfy the statutory limitation and conditions under Section 11B, including the requirement that duty incidence has not been passed on. A claimed mistake of law or absence of unjust enrichment does not overcome stale claims barred by delay and laches, particularly where the levy was not shown to lack legal authority and the original levy proceedings were final. Failure to meet the exemption conditions and statutory refund regime prevents refund relief in writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 564 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288379</link>
      <description>Excise duty refunds require strict compliance with the conditions and prescribed procedure of the relevant exemption notification. Refund claims must also satisfy the statutory limitation and conditions under Section 11B, including the requirement that duty incidence has not been passed on. A claimed mistake of law or absence of unjust enrichment does not overcome stale claims barred by delay and laches, particularly where the levy was not shown to lack legal authority and the original levy proceedings were final. Failure to meet the exemption conditions and statutory refund regime prevents refund relief in writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>