<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22433</link>
    <description>The case involved an assessee firm claiming a deduction for gratuity liability under section 40A(7) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1973-74. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the excess deduction, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The decision emphasized the necessity of actuarial valuation and meeting specific conditions for claiming deductions under section 40A(7), ultimately entitling the Revenue to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:04:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22433</link>
      <description>The case involved an assessee firm claiming a deduction for gratuity liability under section 40A(7) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1973-74. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the excess deduction, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The decision emphasized the necessity of actuarial valuation and meeting specific conditions for claiming deductions under section 40A(7), ultimately entitling the Revenue to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>