https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288375 A rent recovery and eviction statute creating a summary remedy may operate even where occupation, letting, or requisition began before the Act commenced, because no vested right exists in a particular procedural remedy and liability depends on the statutory conditions being met when recovery is sought. However, the machinery cannot be used unless the premises are first established as Government premises or requisitioned property within the Act. On the facts described, no valid requisition notification or delegation was shown, so the premises were not proved to fall within the statutory definition and recovery as arrears of land revenue failed. en-us Tue, 06 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2020 12:07:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288375 A rent recovery and eviction statute creating a summary remedy may operate even where occupation, letting, or requisition began before the Act commenced, because no vested right exists in a particular procedural remedy and liability depends on the statutory conditions being met when recovery is sought. However, the machinery cannot be used unless the premises are first established as Government premises or requisitioned property within the Act. On the facts described, no valid requisition notification or delegation was shown, so the premises were not proved to fall within the statutory definition and recovery as arrears of land revenue failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288375