https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395706 The court found that there was no reduction in the tax rate on the product "Food Processor" as alleged from 01.07.2017. However, it was determined that the respondent had not passed on the benefit of the reduced tax rate from 28% to 18% starting 15.11.2017. The court ordered the respondent to reduce the product price, deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 4,53,949/- with 18% interest in the Consumer Welfare Funds, and instructed further investigation by the DGAP on other products to identify potential profiteering. en-us Tue, 19 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395706 The court found that there was no reduction in the tax rate on the product "Food Processor" as alleged from 01.07.2017. However, it was determined that the respondent had not passed on the benefit of the reduced tax rate from 28% to 18% starting 15.11.2017. The court ordered the respondent to reduce the product price, deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 4,53,949/- with 18% interest in the Consumer Welfare Funds, and instructed further investigation by the DGAP on other products to identify potential profiteering. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395706