<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 76 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395701</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to the defective penalty notice lacking specificity. The tribunal held that the notice&#039;s failure to clearly state the charge breached natural justice principles, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 11:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 76 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395701</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to the defective penalty notice lacking specificity. The tribunal held that the notice&#039;s failure to clearly state the charge breached natural justice principles, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>