<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 73 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 14A by the Assessing Officer as no exempt income was earned. Relying on the Madras High Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of following higher court judgments and held that disallowance cannot be imposed when no exempt income is earned. The Tribunal stressed the CIT(A)&#039;s duty to adhere to decisions of higher courts, leading to the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 73 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 14A by the Assessing Officer as no exempt income was earned. Relying on the Madras High Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of following higher court judgments and held that disallowance cannot be imposed when no exempt income is earned. The Tribunal stressed the CIT(A)&#039;s duty to adhere to decisions of higher courts, leading to the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>