<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the delay condonation application, finding that the appellant was not prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the stipulated period. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, along with all other miscellaneous applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 11:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the delay condonation application, finding that the appellant was not prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the stipulated period. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, along with all other miscellaneous applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>