<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 65 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395690</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition at the admission stage, advising the petitioner to address allegations of fraud and illegality before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) due to ongoing related proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of utilizing statutory remedies, particularly in cases involving fraud, and highlighted the need to respect the statutory framework before seeking judicial intervention under Article 227.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 22:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 65 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395690</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition at the admission stage, advising the petitioner to address allegations of fraud and illegality before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) due to ongoing related proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of utilizing statutory remedies, particularly in cases involving fraud, and highlighted the need to respect the statutory framework before seeking judicial intervention under Article 227.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>