<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 64 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395689</link>
    <description>Interim bail or parole during the COVID-19 pandemic was denied because the petitioner fell outside the High Powered Committee&#039;s temporary release categories for serious economic offences, including proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court accepted that the Committee&#039;s exclusion of such cases applied, and the medical record showed the petitioner&#039;s condition was stable with treatment being provided in custody, so no compelling ground for release was made out. The challenge to the Committee&#039;s classification was not accepted, though the petitioner remained free to make a representation before that Committee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 64 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395689</link>
      <description>Interim bail or parole during the COVID-19 pandemic was denied because the petitioner fell outside the High Powered Committee&#039;s temporary release categories for serious economic offences, including proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court accepted that the Committee&#039;s exclusion of such cases applied, and the medical record showed the petitioner&#039;s condition was stable with treatment being provided in custody, so no compelling ground for release was made out. The challenge to the Committee&#039;s classification was not accepted, though the petitioner remained free to make a representation before that Committee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>