https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395688 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the demands for service tax on 'Commercial Construction Service', 'Business Auxiliary Service', and 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' unsustainable. The appellant's classification under 'Works Contract' service was upheld, and no additional tax liability was imposed. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contentions, leading to the conclusion that all demands were not sustainable, and the appellant's appeal was successful. The decision was pronounced in Open Court on 29/05/2020. en-us Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395688 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the demands for service tax on 'Commercial Construction Service', 'Business Auxiliary Service', and 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' unsustainable. The appellant's classification under 'Works Contract' service was upheld, and no additional tax liability was imposed. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contentions, leading to the conclusion that all demands were not sustainable, and the appellant's appeal was successful. The decision was pronounced in Open Court on 29/05/2020. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395688