<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288374</link>
    <description>Refund arising from finalisation of a provisional assessment is governed by Rule 9B(5), which requires adjustment of duty provisionally paid against the duty finally assessed and mandates refund of any excess. Section 11B is a general refund provision and cannot override the special rule applicable to provisional assessments. The limitation objection under Section 11B therefore did not bar the claim, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the excess duty on final assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 10:06:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288374</link>
      <description>Refund arising from finalisation of a provisional assessment is governed by Rule 9B(5), which requires adjustment of duty provisionally paid against the duty finally assessed and mandates refund of any excess. Section 11B is a general refund provision and cannot override the special rule applicable to provisional assessments. The limitation objection under Section 11B therefore did not bar the claim, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the excess duty on final assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>