https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288362 The Tribunal found in favor of the petitioner, concluding that the respondents engaged in oppression and mismanagement by manipulating the petitioner's resignation and the transfer of her shares. The petition was allowed, restoring the petitioner as the executive director and shareholder of respondent No. 1-company with 39,500 shares. The transfer of shares to respondent No. 5 was declared null and void, and an inquiry into the Registrar of Companies' conduct regarding the extension of the share transfer form's validity was directed. en-us Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 22:27:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288362 The Tribunal found in favor of the petitioner, concluding that the respondents engaged in oppression and mismanagement by manipulating the petitioner's resignation and the transfer of her shares. The petition was allowed, restoring the petitioner as the executive director and shareholder of respondent No. 1-company with 39,500 shares. The transfer of shares to respondent No. 5 was declared null and void, and an inquiry into the Registrar of Companies' conduct regarding the extension of the share transfer form's validity was directed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288362