<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1866 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288371</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the special leave petition. The Court also observed that the petitioner could still approach the appellate authority in accordance with law with an application for condonation of delay, taking into account the time spent before the High Court and Supreme Court in the wrong forums.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 22:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1866 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288371</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the special leave petition. The Court also observed that the petitioner could still approach the appellate authority in accordance with law with an application for condonation of delay, taking into account the time spent before the High Court and Supreme Court in the wrong forums.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>