https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288372 The parties agreed that the company could not function without funding or board meetings while the shareholding dispute remained pending. The consensual arrangement allowed the company to raise debt and equity in accordance with law and to hold board meetings, while keeping the disputed shareholding in abeyance until disposal of the case. The earlier directions were superseded, and the connected applications were disposed of in terms of that consensus. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 22:27:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288372 The parties agreed that the company could not function without funding or board meetings while the shareholding dispute remained pending. The consensual arrangement allowed the company to raise debt and equity in accordance with law and to hold board meetings, while keeping the disputed shareholding in abeyance until disposal of the case. The earlier directions were superseded, and the connected applications were disposed of in terms of that consensus. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288372