https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288352 Where the courts below reject the material substratum of the prosecution case, they cannot discard the core version, retain only fragments of testimony, and reconstruct a different narrative to sustain conviction. Minor or incidental untruths do not justify rejecting the entire prosecution case, but once the essential features of the occurrence are disbelieved, conviction cannot rest on a judicially invented version not advanced by the prosecution. The conviction and sentence were therefore set aside. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:44:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288352 Where the courts below reject the material substratum of the prosecution case, they cannot discard the core version, retain only fragments of testimony, and reconstruct a different narrative to sustain conviction. Minor or incidental untruths do not justify rejecting the entire prosecution case, but once the essential features of the occurrence are disbelieved, conviction cannot rest on a judicially invented version not advanced by the prosecution. The conviction and sentence were therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288352