<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (11) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288351</link>
    <description>Conviction under Section 149 IPC was upheld where eyewitnesses and contemporaneous complaint established an unlawful assembly, use of force, and a shared common object to cause death or knowingly inflict a likely fatal beating. The appellate reversal of Than Singh&#039;s acquittal was also sustained because multiple witnesses implicated him and the trial court had ignored material prosecution evidence. Bhawani&#039;s acquittal was restored, as the evidence against him was weak, his role was not consistently proved, and the trial court&#039;s view of insufficiency was a reasonably possible one. An appellate court should not disturb an acquittal on such evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (11) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288351</link>
      <description>Conviction under Section 149 IPC was upheld where eyewitnesses and contemporaneous complaint established an unlawful assembly, use of force, and a shared common object to cause death or knowingly inflict a likely fatal beating. The appellate reversal of Than Singh&#039;s acquittal was also sustained because multiple witnesses implicated him and the trial court had ignored material prosecution evidence. Bhawani&#039;s acquittal was restored, as the evidence against him was weak, his role was not consistently proved, and the trial court&#039;s view of insufficiency was a reasonably possible one. An appellate court should not disturb an acquittal on such evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>