<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 948 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288347</link>
    <description>A criminal judgment must set out the points for determination, the decision on each point, and the reasons supporting that decision; where material evidence is ignored, irrelevant material is considered, or the conclusion is irrational, the finding becomes perverse. On the record, the trial court dealt with a serious criminal case perfunctorily and without proper appreciation of the evidence, while the High Court affirmed the acquittal without independently examining the evidence or medical material. The absence of adequate reasons was treated as a patent illegality that prevented effective appellate scrutiny, and the acquittal and revisional orders were found unsustainable. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 948 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288347</link>
      <description>A criminal judgment must set out the points for determination, the decision on each point, and the reasons supporting that decision; where material evidence is ignored, irrelevant material is considered, or the conclusion is irrational, the finding becomes perverse. On the record, the trial court dealt with a serious criminal case perfunctorily and without proper appreciation of the evidence, while the High Court affirmed the acquittal without independently examining the evidence or medical material. The absence of adequate reasons was treated as a patent illegality that prevented effective appellate scrutiny, and the acquittal and revisional orders were found unsustainable. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>