https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288341 The court upheld the rejection of the execution application, dismissing the civil revision petition. It found the decree against the second defendant, acting as a legal representative of the deceased principal debtor and a surety, to be valid and enforceable under Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act. The court emphasized the distinct liabilities of a principal debtor and a surety, even when arising from the same transaction, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs. en-us Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 09:51:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288341 The court upheld the rejection of the execution application, dismissing the civil revision petition. It found the decree against the second defendant, acting as a legal representative of the deceased principal debtor and a surety, to be valid and enforceable under Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act. The court emphasized the distinct liabilities of a principal debtor and a surety, even when arising from the same transaction, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288341