https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395665 The petition challenging the denial of benefits under the DFCE Scheme was dismissed, with the court affirming the Supreme Court's binding judgment. The petitioner was found ineligible due to fraudulent export practices, including inflating export figures. Claims for parity with other exporters were rejected, and the petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1 lakh to the 'PM CARES' Fund. The court upheld the validity of notifications under the EXIM Policy 2002-2007, rejecting the argument of retrospective impact on vested rights. The Supreme Court's findings on misuse of the scheme were decisive, precluding re-litigation of the petitioner's eligibility. en-us Mon, 18 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395665 The petition challenging the denial of benefits under the DFCE Scheme was dismissed, with the court affirming the Supreme Court's binding judgment. The petitioner was found ineligible due to fraudulent export practices, including inflating export figures. Claims for parity with other exporters were rejected, and the petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1 lakh to the 'PM CARES' Fund. The court upheld the validity of notifications under the EXIM Policy 2002-2007, rejecting the argument of retrospective impact on vested rights. The Supreme Court's findings on misuse of the scheme were decisive, precluding re-litigation of the petitioner's eligibility. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395665