https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288335 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's request to set aside the tender notice issued by Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) and for the release of pending payments. The lack of privity of contract between the petitioner and IOC or the agency awarded the contract was a crucial factor. The Court emphasized the absence of a direct contractual relationship and the complexity of contractual obligations, leading to the dismissal of the petitioner's claims. The judgment highlighted the availability of civil remedies for the petitioner despite the dismissal of the petition in the context of contractual relations and payment disputes. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 01:37:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288335 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's request to set aside the tender notice issued by Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) and for the release of pending payments. The lack of privity of contract between the petitioner and IOC or the agency awarded the contract was a crucial factor. The Court emphasized the absence of a direct contractual relationship and the complexity of contractual obligations, leading to the dismissal of the petitioner's claims. The judgment highlighted the availability of civil remedies for the petitioner despite the dismissal of the petition in the context of contractual relations and payment disputes. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288335