<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 650 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288325</link>
    <description>SKD/CKD motor vehicle imports may be classified as complete motor cars for customs tariff purposes under Rule 2(a) when the consignments show the essential character of finished vehicles, even though physically imported as components. That legal fiction does not automatically defeat customs exemption notifications: where the imported parts satisfy the notification conditions, exemption remains available according to the notification&#039;s terms. For import-control purposes, the same deeming rule cannot convert otherwise permitted components and parts into prohibited passenger cars. On the facts considered, the imports were covered by the applicable policy, and confiscation with redemption fine was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 18:31:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 650 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288325</link>
      <description>SKD/CKD motor vehicle imports may be classified as complete motor cars for customs tariff purposes under Rule 2(a) when the consignments show the essential character of finished vehicles, even though physically imported as components. That legal fiction does not automatically defeat customs exemption notifications: where the imported parts satisfy the notification conditions, exemption remains available according to the notification&#039;s terms. For import-control purposes, the same deeming rule cannot convert otherwise permitted components and parts into prohibited passenger cars. On the facts considered, the imports were covered by the applicable policy, and confiscation with redemption fine was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>