https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395659 The court, after considering the petitioner's claims of harassment by the Income Tax Department and the subsequent rectification orders leading to higher demands, found no legitimate tax demand against the petitioner. A notice was issued to the respondents, and the senior Standing counsel accepted it, with directions to examine the matter. The respondents were restrained from taking any recovery steps regarding the disputed demand. The case was scheduled for further proceedings with instructions for order dissemination and provision to counsel. en-us Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:42:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395659 The court, after considering the petitioner's claims of harassment by the Income Tax Department and the subsequent rectification orders leading to higher demands, found no legitimate tax demand against the petitioner. A notice was issued to the respondents, and the senior Standing counsel accepted it, with directions to examine the matter. The respondents were restrained from taking any recovery steps regarding the disputed demand. The case was scheduled for further proceedings with instructions for order dissemination and provision to counsel. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395659