https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395656 The Tribunal held that the ACIT, Circle-23(1), Hooghly did not have jurisdiction to pass assessment orders for the assessment year 2015-16, as jurisdiction lay with the ITO, Ward-23(4), Hooghly. The assessments completed by the ACIT were deemed void ab initio. Citing precedents, the Tribunal quashed the assessment orders, upholding the assessee's argument. The appeals of the assessee were allowed. en-us Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:42:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395656 The Tribunal held that the ACIT, Circle-23(1), Hooghly did not have jurisdiction to pass assessment orders for the assessment year 2015-16, as jurisdiction lay with the ITO, Ward-23(4), Hooghly. The assessments completed by the ACIT were deemed void ab initio. Citing precedents, the Tribunal quashed the assessment orders, upholding the assessee's argument. The appeals of the assessee were allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395656