<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 30 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395655</link>
    <description>The ITAT disposed of cross appeals involving the same assessee for assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. The Department&#039;s appeals were largely dismissed, with certain grounds upheld based on precedents. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with issues regarding disallowance under Section 14A set aside for fresh adjudication. The decisions considered legal precedents and extraordinary circumstances, including the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 30 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395655</link>
      <description>The ITAT disposed of cross appeals involving the same assessee for assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. The Department&#039;s appeals were largely dismissed, with certain grounds upheld based on precedents. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with issues regarding disallowance under Section 14A set aside for fresh adjudication. The decisions considered legal precedents and extraordinary circumstances, including the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>