<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the benefit of section 54F amounting to Rs. 2,07,62,580/-, thereby setting aside the findings of the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the substance of the transaction and the actual date of possession as the determining factor for the purchase of the new asset under section 54F. The appeal was thus allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the benefit of section 54F amounting to Rs. 2,07,62,580/-, thereby setting aside the findings of the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the substance of the transaction and the actual date of possession as the determining factor for the purchase of the new asset under section 54F. The appeal was thus allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>