<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 24 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395649</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that interconnection usage charges (IUC) do not qualify as fees for technical services, thus exempting the assessee from TDS obligations under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also validated the delayed order pronouncement beyond the 90-day period due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in accordance with judicial guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 24 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395649</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that interconnection usage charges (IUC) do not qualify as fees for technical services, thus exempting the assessee from TDS obligations under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also validated the delayed order pronouncement beyond the 90-day period due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in accordance with judicial guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>