<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 18 - MADHYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395643</link>
    <description>The court set aside the previous orders and directed a fresh e-auction to obtain the best price for the company&#039;s assets. The appellant&#039;s offer of Rs. 30,69,00,000 should be considered, with the appellant bearing the cost of the new auction. The process must be completed within 60 days to ensure transparency and fairness, emphasizing the court&#039;s obligation to secure the highest price for the benefit of creditors and stakeholders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 18 - MADHYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395643</link>
      <description>The court set aside the previous orders and directed a fresh e-auction to obtain the best price for the company&#039;s assets. The appellant&#039;s offer of Rs. 30,69,00,000 should be considered, with the appellant bearing the cost of the new auction. The process must be completed within 60 days to ensure transparency and fairness, emphasizing the court&#039;s obligation to secure the highest price for the benefit of creditors and stakeholders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>