https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395640 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad due to the appellant's consistent non-appearance in multiple hearings despite various opportunities granted. The appellant's alleged participation in the SVLDRS scheme was mentioned, with the Tribunal providing a chance for the appellant to restore the appeal if they had not applied for the scheme and wished to continue the appeal. The judgment highlighted the necessity of timely appearance, compliance with legal procedures, and active participation in legal proceedings to avoid adverse outcomes such as appeal dismissal. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:41:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395640 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad due to the appellant's consistent non-appearance in multiple hearings despite various opportunities granted. The appellant's alleged participation in the SVLDRS scheme was mentioned, with the Tribunal providing a chance for the appellant to restore the appeal if they had not applied for the scheme and wished to continue the appeal. The judgment highlighted the necessity of timely appearance, compliance with legal procedures, and active participation in legal proceedings to avoid adverse outcomes such as appeal dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395640