<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 14 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395639</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that there was no need for the appellant to file a refund claim for the voluntarily reversed credit. The tribunal emphasized that the legality of the credit had already been established in a previous order in the appellant&#039;s case, and therefore, the Revenue&#039;s objection did not stand. The appellant was deemed entitled to avail the Cenvat Credit that was voluntarily reversed without any outflow of funds, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2020 04:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 14 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395639</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that there was no need for the appellant to file a refund claim for the voluntarily reversed credit. The tribunal emphasized that the legality of the credit had already been established in a previous order in the appellant&#039;s case, and therefore, the Revenue&#039;s objection did not stand. The appellant was deemed entitled to avail the Cenvat Credit that was voluntarily reversed without any outflow of funds, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>