<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1494 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288312</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed Appeal No. ST/21750/2014, granting consequential relief, while dismissing Appeal Nos. ST/26087/2013, ST/27168/2013, and ST/28025/2013 as withdrawn. The decision emphasized the significance of credit eligibility and nexus between input and output services in refund claims, clarifying the interpretation of relevant rules and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2020 04:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1494 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288312</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed Appeal No. ST/21750/2014, granting consequential relief, while dismissing Appeal Nos. ST/26087/2013, ST/27168/2013, and ST/28025/2013 as withdrawn. The decision emphasized the significance of credit eligibility and nexus between input and output services in refund claims, clarifying the interpretation of relevant rules and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>