<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Deletes Additions u/s 69B After Questioning DVO&#039;s Report on Hotel Building&#039;s Unexplained Investments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53544</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69B on the basis of DVO&#039;s report only - Unexplained investment in the hotel building - 99 years lease deed was converted to a sale deed - registered valuer assessed / determined the value of the property at a later date without taking into consideration the actual facts and circumstances of the case. - Additions deleted</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 12:50:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 12:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Deletes Additions u/s 69B After Questioning DVO&#039;s Report on Hotel Building&#039;s Unexplained Investments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53544</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69B on the basis of DVO&#039;s report only - Unexplained investment in the hotel building - 99 years lease deed was converted to a sale deed - registered valuer assessed / determined the value of the property at a later date without taking into consideration the actual facts and circumstances of the case. - Additions deleted</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 12:50:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>