<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 647 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395614</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, providing relief on certain grounds while upholding decisions on others. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was remanded for fresh consideration to the CIT(A) due to procedural issues. The additions based on the Valuation Officer&#039;s report were deleted as unreliable, and estimates for room rent and restaurant sales were adjusted, granting partial relief to the assessee. Discrepancies in room rent and food sales accounts were addressed, resulting in limited additions. Overall, the Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on some issues but upheld the lower authorities&#039; rulings on others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 12:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 647 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395614</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, providing relief on certain grounds while upholding decisions on others. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was remanded for fresh consideration to the CIT(A) due to procedural issues. The additions based on the Valuation Officer&#039;s report were deleted as unreliable, and estimates for room rent and restaurant sales were adjusted, granting partial relief to the assessee. Discrepancies in room rent and food sales accounts were addressed, resulting in limited additions. Overall, the Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on some issues but upheld the lower authorities&#039; rulings on others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>