https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395609 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, as the reasons provided by the appellant were deemed unsatisfactory. The appellant's delay was not considered justified under the Limitation Act, as it was found that the decision to appeal was influenced by a subsequent decision against a co-noticee rather than valid grounds. Consequently, the impugned appeal was dismissed due to the lack of sufficient cause for the delay. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2020 12:38:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395609 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, as the reasons provided by the appellant were deemed unsatisfactory. The appellant's delay was not considered justified under the Limitation Act, as it was found that the decision to appeal was influenced by a subsequent decision against a co-noticee rather than valid grounds. Consequently, the impugned appeal was dismissed due to the lack of sufficient cause for the delay. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395609