<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 636 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395603</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging reassessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act were not entertained because entitlement to Input Tax Credit and the correctness of reassessment depended on disputed factual questions requiring record-based verification. The Court treated the appellate forum as the proper body to examine those issues, since it could call for the relevant material and conduct a fact-finding exercise. In view of the effective statutory appeal remedy, writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate for deciding the merits of the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 11:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 636 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395603</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging reassessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act were not entertained because entitlement to Input Tax Credit and the correctness of reassessment depended on disputed factual questions requiring record-based verification. The Court treated the appellate forum as the proper body to examine those issues, since it could call for the relevant material and conduct a fact-finding exercise. In view of the effective statutory appeal remedy, writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate for deciding the merits of the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>