<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1779 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288295</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions due to the petitioners&#039; suppression of material facts, violation of lease conditions, and lack of merit in arguments regarding natural justice, jurisdiction, and the applicability of the Public Premises Act. The decision to cancel the lease agreement and issue eviction orders was upheld as the court found no illegality in the respondents&#039; actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 11:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1779 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288295</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions due to the petitioners&#039; suppression of material facts, violation of lease conditions, and lack of merit in arguments regarding natural justice, jurisdiction, and the applicability of the Public Premises Act. The decision to cancel the lease agreement and issue eviction orders was upheld as the court found no illegality in the respondents&#039; actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>