<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 632 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395599</link>
    <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) to revise the assessment under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding the deduction on duty draw back under Section 80-I. It affirmed the disallowance of exemption on duty draw back for traded goods and upheld the revisional order for the assessment year 1989-90 under Section 263, emphasizing that issues not considered in appeal are subject to revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 632 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395599</link>
      <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) to revise the assessment under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding the deduction on duty draw back under Section 80-I. It affirmed the disallowance of exemption on duty draw back for traded goods and upheld the revisional order for the assessment year 1989-90 under Section 263, emphasizing that issues not considered in appeal are subject to revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>