<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 630 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s adoption of the Transactional Net Margin Method over the Cost Plus Method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The Tribunal found the TPO did not follow proper procedure in justifying the method change, leading to the deletion of the ALP adjustment. Additionally, the delay in pronouncement of the order due to the COVID-19 lockdown was deemed justified, resulting in the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 11:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 630 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s adoption of the Transactional Net Margin Method over the Cost Plus Method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The Tribunal found the TPO did not follow proper procedure in justifying the method change, leading to the deletion of the ALP adjustment. Additionally, the delay in pronouncement of the order due to the COVID-19 lockdown was deemed justified, resulting in the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>