<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 607 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395574</link>
    <description>Online booking charges collected by multiplex operators were treated as part of the &quot;payment for admission&quot; under the Tamil Nadu Entertainment Tax Act, 1939. The Court reasoned that a charge connected with attending entertainment and required as part of the admission process is not separate from the ticket price merely because it is described differently. It applied the broad statutory reach of payments made &quot;in relation to&quot; or &quot;in connection with&quot; entertainment, holding that the booking facility was integral to obtaining entry to the theatre. The levy was therefore upheld and the writ petitions challenging the demands failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 607 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395574</link>
      <description>Online booking charges collected by multiplex operators were treated as part of the &quot;payment for admission&quot; under the Tamil Nadu Entertainment Tax Act, 1939. The Court reasoned that a charge connected with attending entertainment and required as part of the admission process is not separate from the ticket price merely because it is described differently. It applied the broad statutory reach of payments made &quot;in relation to&quot; or &quot;in connection with&quot; entertainment, holding that the booking facility was integral to obtaining entry to the theatre. The levy was therefore upheld and the writ petitions challenging the demands failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>