<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1490 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288270</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2009-10. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions allowing advertisement and publicity expenses under Section 37 of the IT Act, 1961, and dismissing disallowance under Section 14A r.w.r. 8D in the absence of exempt income. The Court found no substantial question of law in both issues and therefore dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 10:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1490 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288270</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2009-10. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions allowing advertisement and publicity expenses under Section 37 of the IT Act, 1961, and dismissing disallowance under Section 14A r.w.r. 8D in the absence of exempt income. The Court found no substantial question of law in both issues and therefore dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>