<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1408 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund for Service Tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on services received before the introduction of G.S.T., emphasizing the satisfaction of statutory requirements and legal entitlement. The decision was supported by a judicial precedent from the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, aligning with the appellant&#039;s claim and overturning the Revenue&#039;s rejection based on Section 142 transitional provisions of the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 10:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1408 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund for Service Tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on services received before the introduction of G.S.T., emphasizing the satisfaction of statutory requirements and legal entitlement. The decision was supported by a judicial precedent from the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, aligning with the appellant&#039;s claim and overturning the Revenue&#039;s rejection based on Section 142 transitional provisions of the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>