<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 104 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22392</link>
    <description>A male Hindu who inherited ancestral property and died without a son, son&#039;s son or son&#039;s son&#039;s son was treated as having full power of disposition over that property. On that basis, the property was regarded as capable of passing on death under section 6 of the Estate Duty Act, rather than being confined to a notional half share under the Hindu Succession Act. The entire inherited property was therefore includible in computing the principal value of the estate, and the notional partition argument was rejected on the facts stated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 104 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22392</link>
      <description>A male Hindu who inherited ancestral property and died without a son, son&#039;s son or son&#039;s son&#039;s son was treated as having full power of disposition over that property. On that basis, the property was regarded as capable of passing on death under section 6 of the Estate Duty Act, rather than being confined to a notional half share under the Hindu Succession Act. The entire inherited property was therefore includible in computing the principal value of the estate, and the notional partition argument was rejected on the facts stated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>