https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288262 Bombay HC treated the jackpot rules and the signed receipt as written instruments capable of construction on originating summons, because the dispute turned on the documents alone and involved no complex factual controversy. It therefore found the summons maintainable and properly entertained. On payment, Rule 8 by itself did not give an enforceable right to insist on cheque payment, but Rule 8 read with the receipt created a contractual undertaking to pay the winning tickets by cheque. The special contractual mode of payment prevailed, and the claim was upheld on construction of the documents. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 May 2020 16:14:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288262 Bombay HC treated the jackpot rules and the signed receipt as written instruments capable of construction on originating summons, because the dispute turned on the documents alone and involved no complex factual controversy. It therefore found the summons maintainable and properly entertained. On payment, Rule 8 by itself did not give an enforceable right to insist on cheque payment, but Rule 8 read with the receipt created a contractual undertaking to pay the winning tickets by cheque. The special contractual mode of payment prevailed, and the claim was upheld on construction of the documents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288262