<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1099 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288259</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80-I was not admissible on export incentive and cash compensatory assistance received on exports because such receipts were not attributable to the manufacturing activity. The issue was treated as covered by the Supreme Court ruling in CIT v. Sterling Foods, and on that basis the claimed deduction could not be sustained. The question was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 12:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1099 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288259</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80-I was not admissible on export incentive and cash compensatory assistance received on exports because such receipts were not attributable to the manufacturing activity. The issue was treated as covered by the Supreme Court ruling in CIT v. Sterling Foods, and on that basis the claimed deduction could not be sustained. The question was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>