<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 592 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 10,10,000, based on the principle that earlier withdrawals should be presumed available for redeposit unless contrary evidence is provided. The decision emphasized the need for the department to provide concrete evidence when disputing the source of deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 11:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 592 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 10,10,000, based on the principle that earlier withdrawals should be presumed available for redeposit unless contrary evidence is provided. The decision emphasized the need for the department to provide concrete evidence when disputing the source of deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>