<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 368 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the lower authorities&#039; findings and dismissed the appeal. It held that the goods did not qualify for the concessional rate under Notification No. 40/78, the duty determination date is the Bill of Entry date, and a special discount cannot be deducted from the assessable value. The additional ground on Countervailing Duty was not considered, emphasizing that new arguments at the appellate stage without prior raising are impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 10:04:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 368 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the lower authorities&#039; findings and dismissed the appeal. It held that the goods did not qualify for the concessional rate under Notification No. 40/78, the duty determination date is the Bill of Entry date, and a special discount cannot be deducted from the assessable value. The additional ground on Countervailing Duty was not considered, emphasizing that new arguments at the appellate stage without prior raising are impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>